River’s 3rd Birthday is January 14, 2017. The last time Adam let me speak to my own son, was via FaceTime, exactly one year ago, on his 2nd birthday. My son River has been held hostage with our abusers, Adam Lewis & Lawrence Lewis, for 17 months. The photo below was a screenshot from FaceTime 1/14/16, his second birthday, and the last time Ive been allowed any contact with my own infant son. He is held captive by old grown men using him, abusing him, and my son is at the center of a world wide pedophile/child-abusing network shakedown, through he judicial system which is trafficking children to abusers daily for money, and kickbacks from the federal government.
My federal lawsuit for his kidnapping begins this month, January 2017. I am almost done with the paperwork and am excited to turn it in!
No one has seen my son in person in since this photo was taken 1/14/16, that is not of Adam’s abuser group. They conceal my child for various nefarious reasons. Adam himself if hiding from public scrutiny around what he is doing to and with my baby, and why he is hiding him from his own mother, since there was no crime committed and no reason to take River in the first place!
It’s TIME. I Need Your Help! I Am filing a federal lawsuit against all parties, both Washington and Oregon State, the Seattle and Portland Police Departments, Portland State, Kaitlyn Schmitz, Nathan Cliber, Jennifer Barbee, Carol Hough, Jamie Pennell, Emily Brewer, Luke Hillman, Jamie Johnston, Mary Miller, Jolynn Jordan, Jordan Markin, ALL of the judges and retired judges, Danielle the court clerk….and many many more.
In total, $667 Million Dollars in damages and full legal and sole physical custody of my own son, River Roland Anderson.
Podcast Interview Tonight 1/6/17
“It is well settled that in appropriate cases the federal courts may grant relief from prior judgements obtained by fraud.”
@DukeLawJournal [Vol.1964:109 pg.113]
Fraud on the court occurs when the judicial machinery itself has been tainted, such as when an attorney, who is an officer of the court, is involved in the perpetration of a fraud or makes material misrepresentations to the court.
Fraud upon the court makes void the orders and judgments of that court.
In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated “Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. … It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function — thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.”
Judge Stephen Trott of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals wrote:
“Perjury is a crime under both federal & CA state law, as is the knowing submission of false evidence to a court”
WHEN LOVE WINS: HOW HUMAN TRAFFICKING SURVIVOR ELISIA LOPEZ REUNITED WITH SON NAHKO BEAR
We call each other sister, a title given to a close-knit circle of survivors of human trafficking. Whatever she’s doing, it’s important: she’s helping someone. I know because she regularly provides food, blankets, friendship and clinical counseling from her office at Central City Concern for Portland’s abused and downtrodden.
I also know she has a powerful story. Sold by her mother at 12, she later gave up her firstborn for adoption. Today many find inspiration from her son, Nahko Bear, water protector and front man for Nahko & Medicine for the People. This is her journey…..
January is Human Trafficking Awareness Month, and it does my heart good to be a survivor leader helping to make that change today.
…Nahko lovingly calls his mother a BAB (Bad Ass Bitch), and she can be — on the outside. He tells me how impressed he is as he watches her embrace his band and the many fans and social justice activists drawn to his powerful music. But what I also see is the heart of a young girl, a woman, a sister, a mother who is on a long journey to heal from the betrayal of her own sacred mother and reconcile the scattered pieces of her life into humanity again. Love wins. end
Federal Court: Plaintiffs’ Lawyers Can Be Prosecuted Using Racketeering Laws Originally Intended For Mobsters
“Hopefully Chevron v. Danziger will prevent future asbestos-type mass litigation disasters through its powerful message to plaintiff’s attorneys in the mass-tort litigation business: litigate by the rules, or face serious consequences.”
Fraud in the inducement
is the use of deceit or trick to cause someone to act to his/her disadvantage, such as signing an agreement. The heart of this type of fraud is misleading the other party as to the facts upon which he/she will base his/her decision to act. A person is induced to enter into a transaction with a false impression of the risks, duties, or obligations involved. There is intentional misrepresentation of a material risk or duty reasonably relied on, thereby injuring the other party without vitiating the contract itself. For example, A tells his mother to sign a deed giving him her property, and his mother refuses to do so. A falsely tells her that the bank will foreclose on the property unless she signs it over to him. If A’s mother signs the deed because of this statement from A, and A tries to enforce the deed, Mother can plead “fraud in the inducement.” Fraud in the inducement is also termed as fraud in the procurement
It is clearly stamped MARCH 10, 2016, ….NOT MARCH 19, 2016, as Judge Richard Eadie professed on official legal documents, outright refusing to acknowledge the ink on the paper because it conflicts with his previous fraudulent verdict. This man is either crazy himself, and should not be on the bench, or he’s outright committing felony child trafficking because he thinks he can! He thinks he’s not going to get caught! They all do!
They couldnt be more wrong!
Huffington Post: A Broken System: Court Sanctioned Legal Abuse 12/10/2016 05:51 am ET | Updated Dec 27, 2016
Extortion and threats play out on a vast scale in divorce and child custody cases — often by means of infusing criminal elements into civil issues.
Carson vs Elrod
No bond is more precious and none should be more zealously protected by the law as the bond between parent and child 411 F Supp 645, 649, DC E. DO VA 1976
Any conduct that
“shocks the conscience”
“offends community sense of FairPlay & decency”
Rochin v. California(52)
Pittsley v. Warish(91)
Daughter sues Orange County after being taken from mom, who got $9.6M in same case
Jan. 9, 2017 Updated Jan. 10, 2017 12:09 p.m.
In the sequel to the costliest-ever liability lawsuit against Orange County, a federal appellate court has affirmed that the county once again is not immune from liability for a 2000 incident in which a woman alleges that two social workers committed perjury to separate her from her mom when she was a young girl.
The ruling issued Tuesday by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is based on the same events that caused a jury to award Deanna Fogarty-Hardwick $9.6 million from Orange County in 2011 after she alleged that social workers used fabricated evidence to cause a court to remove her two daughters from her custody for six and a half years.
Now, Fogarty-Hardwick’s daughter, Preslie Hardwick, who was one of the two girls separated from her mom, also is suing the county. And while the appellate court’s ruling does not address the merits of Hardwick’s complaint, it suggests the county could be on the hook to pay out once again.
“No official with an IQ greater than room temperature in Alaska could claim that he or she did not know that the conduct at the center of this case violated both state and federal law,” Judge Stephen Trott wrote in Tuesday’s opinion. “Perjury is a crime under both federal and California state law, as is the knowing submission of false evidence to a court. … Because they are supported by the record as a whole, we construe the facts Preslie offers in support of her allegations in the light most favorable to her.”
Hardwick’s allegations are the same as her mother’s: that in February 2000, Orange County Social Services agents Marcie Vreeken and Helen Dwojak fabricated testimony “that (Fogarty-Hardwick) had caused her daughters to skip a mandatory visit with their father, when in fact the problem was caused by a visitation monitor.”
Hardwick also alleges the social workers falsely advised the court that Fogarty-Hardwick had turned her daughters – ages 6 and 9 at the time – against their visitation monitor and that Fogarty-Hardwick had told her children that their father was trying to take them away from her.
According to Tuesday’s opinion, county attorneys argued that it was not clearly established in civil court at the time of the events in question that in situations such as Hardwick’s, those involved had “the right to be free from deliberately fabricated evidence.” The court disagreed with that assertion.
On Thursday, Preslie Hardwick’s attorney Robert Powell said he would let the appellate court ruling “simmer with the county” over the weekend before submitting a seven-figure settlement offer next week.
County attorneys declined to comment on whether they might recommend settling the case. It wasn’t immediately known whether they would appeal the ruling.
Orange County officials have maintained that its social workers never wronged Fogarty-Hardwick or her family. Neither employee was disciplined and Vreeken was later promoted to a position in which she trains other social workers. County records show Vreeken was still employed in 2015, when she earned $132,466 in total compensation.
County Supervisor Todd Spitzer said that social workers often face difficult decisions when deciding when and whether to separate a child from their parents and that it was important for those employees to know that the county backs their decisions.
“Social workers have an immense responsibility to protect children, and I’d much rather have a social worker err on the side of taking a child from the home than leave a kid where there might be suspected child abuse,” Spitzer said. “It’s a delicate balance, and social workers needs to know that if they do that the county will back them up.”
In 2011, a jury awarded Fogarty-Hardwick $4.9 million in damages. The county appealed the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to hear it. During that time, interest and additional attorney fees increased her total payout to $9.6 million. The county also incurred an additional $1 million for its own legal costs on the case.
Preslie Hardwick’s sister Kendall is also suing Orange County, according to court records.
to show an example of how they are figuring out ways to let off the sex offenders, and attacking and criminalizing the protective mothers!
Court finds ‘outrageous’ conduct by police, dismisses case
By MARILYN NAPIER @Marilyn_SVH Dec 13, 2016 (3)
MOUNT VERNON — Criminal charges against an Anacortes man were dismissed by a judge Dec. 1 because of outrageous government conduct, marking only the second time in state history that charges have been dismissed on that basis.
Joshua Solomon was charged in 2014 with commercial sexual abuse of a minor, communication with a minor for immoral purposes and attempted rape of a child in the third degree following a police sex sting carried out by Skagit Multiple Agency Response Team detectives.
The charges were dismissed by Skagit County Superior Court judge Michael Rickert, who sided with defense lawyer George Freeman that law enforcement had instigated the situation that led Solomon to be charged with the crimes.
Due to procedural practices, the charges will likely be officially dismissed later this week.
The only other time in the state that a court has dismissed charges based on outrageous government conduct was in the 1996 Washington Supreme Court case State v. Lively.
Solomon’s defense team drew comparisons between the two cases.
Solomon was one of six men arrested in September 2014 during a monthlong investigation that involved detectives posing as minors online. The men were arrested after they made plans to meet a fictional child for possible sexual purposes.
Solomon, who was 29 at the time, first came in contact with a detective posing as a 14-year-old girl after Solomon entered a Craigslist chat room for casual encounters.
According to court records, a notice on the Craigslist site read: “by clicking the link below, you confirm that you are 18 or older.”
Freeman stated in court that the legal age requirement was the reason Solomon entered the chat room.
“Mr. Solomon relied upon the statement that the individuals in the (chat) room were 18. Somewhere during the conversation, the detective made the statement that, oh, by the way, I’m 14, almost 15,” Freeman said in court.
Freeman argued that the detective instigated the crime and that 60 percent of the contacts with Solomon were initiated by the detective.
Court documents reveal email and text message conversations between Solomon and the detective posing as the minor over the course of a week in September 2014.
The conversations detail that the initial contact between Solomon and the detective posing as the girl began when Solomon responded to a Craigslist ad placed by the detective.
When the detective involved in the sting told Solomon she was only 14, Solomon responded that it probably wasn’t a good idea and wrote, “I’m not willing to get in trouble … maybe hit me up in 3 years if your [sic] still around girl,” according to court documents.
Part of the detective’s response to Solomon was “Age is only a number and your [sic] married anyway … so your [sic] already in trouble,” court documents state.
Solomon responded by rejecting the offer by the detective posing as the girl to meet up, saying he thought something didn’t add up.
At one point, Solomon wrote, “I take everything back not interested at all this is a setup by cops or a website good luck to you,” court documents state.
The two continued to have text and email conversations in which the detective posing as the girl sent explicit messages to Solomon about wanting to meet him for sex.
“I think that this behavior meets the burden of outrageous government conduct,” Freeman said in court. “She clearly lured him in, she clearly instigated the crime. And for those reasons, I ask you to dismiss the charge this morning.”
Skagit County prosecutor Paul Nielsen argued that Solomon was not sought out by police, contrary to the case involving Lively.
Nielsen argued Solomon could have stopped responding to the detective’s messages, but didn’t.
“The government in this case was not controlling the criminal activity. This is text messaging between two people,” Nielsen said in court. “We’re not talking about face-to-face meetings. We’re not talking about emotional manipulation like in Lively.”
In court, Rickert described the detective’s actions in the case as outrageous, egregious and over-the-top.
Rickert agreed that Solomon could have cut off the conversation with the detective posing as the girl at any time.
“Mr. Solomon was not righteous and does not have clean hands,” Rickert said. “He’s not wearing white gloves in this either.”
However, Rickert called the language the detective used when talking to Solomon “repugnant.”
“The sex trade on the internet is a horrendous problem,” Rickert said. “The detectives and law enforcement have to do something to do that (address the problem), they need to do stings, but we need to have a line about how far is too far, and I think this is a good one to do that on.”
Solomon is relieved to have the charges dismissed, Freeman said, adding that the case is nothing personal against law enforcement.
“In Skagit County, we have very good law enforcement people, excellent judges and a very confident defense bar,” Freeman said. “We act as checks and balances to one another from time to time. This case means the system works the way it was designed to work. I’m a believer that the ends do not justify the means, even if it makes your blood boil.”
Skagit County Prosecuting Attorney Rich Weyrich said he is disappointed with the dismissal of the charges and that he will consider the option of taking the case to the state Court of Appeals.
Reporter Marilyn Napier: 360-416-2149, firstname.lastname@example.org,
In politics, nothing happens by accident.
If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Woman charged in killing, dismemberment of daughter worked for Northampton County child services, had foster kids
A woman charged with killing her adoptive daughter last year worked as an “adoption supervisor” for Northampton County before being suspended in 2010, and throughout that time also took in several foster children, authorities said Monday.
Sara Packer, the adoptive mother of 14-year-old Grace Packer, is charged in Bucks County along with Jacob Sullivan, Sara Packer’s boyfriend, in the brutal [rape and] death of the teen who had been reported missing last summer.
Judge sanctions CPS for illegally removing child and then lying about it in court
POSTED:SEP 08 2016 09:31PM CDT
UPDATED:SEP 09 2016 11:01AM CDT
HOUSTON – Two years ago CPS removed this 3-year-old girl from her father.
The father apparently did everything CPS wanted and associate family court Judge Paula Vlahakos thought the child would be returned home.
But after the judge noticed the foster parents had filed a custody intervention she began investigating the case.
That prompted the judge to appoint Dennis Slate to represent the girl’s father.
“It was very clear early on CPS had taken this child without a court order and had done so in a way that wasn’t even following the law that allows them to do that,” Slate said.
That prompted Slate to file a motion for sanctions against Child Protective Services.
“They were looking for any reason to avoid those sanctions,” said Slate.
CPS even tried to dismiss the suit but Judge Vlahakos found the state agency had acted in bad faith when they removed the little girl.
“There wasn’t a reason at all for them to come and do a removal without a court order on a Friday night when this little girl was asleep,” Slate said.
When the judge grilled CPS for a reason behind the child’s removal Slate says all the judge got from CPS were lies.
“Various witnesses for CPS testified to various stories,” Slate said. “But the court didn’t believe any of the different stories that everybody told because there were so many of them.”
In a rare move Judge Vlahakos ordered CPS to pay Slates 27 thousand 500 dollar legal fees.
Then she did something that should leave CPS workers involved in this case red-faced for some time.
“And Judge Vlahakos ordered them to read the Texas Constitution and the Bill of Rights that the citizens of Texas have against illegal governmental intrusion into their life,” Slate said.
“At this time CPS has no comment.”
That’s all CPS had to say to us when we asked about the sanctions.
In her court order Judge Vlahkos also suggests that all CPS caseworkers supervisors and program directors in Harris County read the United States Constitution the Texas Constitution and the family code that deals with the removal of children.
Arkansas Senator Writes to DHS “The Gloves are About to Come Off” as Cover-up in Stanley Case is Discovered 
Child Welfare Manifesto
On December 26, 2016,
Senator Alan Clark posted to his Facebook page his vision for Child Protective Services, which he has entitled “Child Welfare Manifesto.”
In it, he acknowledges the great harm that is being done to children in the name of protecting them, and gives some common sense considerations that lawmakers in every state would do well to pay attention to as they examine the Child Protective Services agency and its impact on the families in their state.
Here is the document in its entirety:
CHILD WELFARE MANIFESTO
The new rule in child welfare should be borrowed from Hippocrates. First, do no harm.
There is so much argument about how often the government/state should intervene, how much we should intervene, how we should intervene, should we intervene.
We know or we should know of the intense psychological, often permanent trauma that can be and is inflicted by removing children from their families and placing them with strangers. Every time we move them that trauma is compounded. If the strangers we place them with are not extraordinary human beings the trauma is compounded more.
We must consider that before we remove a child. Someone who truly understands the weight of that should be the only one making that decision. We should be absolutely sure that we have a better solution before we make that removal.
We cannot continue to make the decision that a child’s current situation is not acceptable, only to move them into another unacceptable situation. That is child abuse perpetrated by the state.
We do not just need to reform the system. We need to rethink the very nexus of the system. We cannot continue to assume that the new situation for the child is superior to the old situation, simply because it is the best the state can do today.
Children are not playing cards to be shuffled here and there at the state’s whim. They are not cattle that can be herded from pasture to pasture as it is convenient for the state. For that matter, neither are parents or foster parents. If we are going to take custody of a child it must be with the same care that we would parent our own child. Anything less is to be guilty of negligence ourselves.
The horrible situations that some children face should no longer be used as an excuse for trauma and abuse both, active and passive, committed by actors of the state, even with the best intentions.
We either must intervene in less cases or we become a much more intensively, caring, compassionate, thinking nursery to the children we profess to care so much about that we took them in the first place. If a child is going to suffer abuse it is better that they suffer it in the natural surroundings of their own family than in the foreign unnatural surroundings perpetrated by the state.
There are enough cases out there of the state making egregious mistakes to place the State of Arkansas on the Child Maltreatment List, I think. The state can appeal, but that is one case where I would like to be the administrative law judge.
-Arkansas Senator Alan Clark
“Parental alienation is a devastating problem affecting millions of families around the world. Unfortunately, much like how we addressed domestic violence several decades ago, we treat parental alienation as a domestic issue rather than as a problem that affects communities, school systems, police and court systems, mental health and financial institutions, and legislative bodies. I will discuss how our social and cultural systems sanction and even promote parental alienation at the expense of our children, and what can be done about it.
Published on Mar 14, 2016″ (Video Above)
Video #4: The Living Tree Operational Model (OM)🌲℗®©🌹
The Video Jenny is speaking of, video #4 below dated June 4th. Without speaking much to Lonna in between June 4th 2015 and sometime mid-July 2015, when she wrote the defaming testimony below on me to the courts, somewhere in there without talking to me, jenny completely did a 180* and turned on me, confronting me about non-sense AFTER she had wrote her lying testimony on me behind my back for Adam. Total Blackmail!
This flattery in the above text was one of the last correspondence I had with Jenny Barbee in that 30-day span (she’s all the grey responses), and you can see that in surprise in my tone when she comes at me in this condescending and exaggerating tone a month after flattering me.
I call her out immediately for being on hard-drugs (of which I have another text below trying to help her get off with herbs) and jealous and doing criminal behavior against me and my son!
Because I posted the synchronicity of me finding this magazine with my last name on it while out for a run, and I study bacteria, viruses and degenerative diseases, Jennifer Barbee exaggerated this post of this picture below I posted on my personal Facebook, saying I was thinking I was Doctor Md Anderson, or some non-sense like that, as you can read in the text above, and excerpt she submitted to the courts below. This is a misrepresentation of truth to skew the mind of the court into believing defaming and untrue personal beliefs Jennifer her self has, projected insecurities exacerbated by poor lifestyle and heavy drug use, which she also projects on me, Lonna to get my son illegally taken out of my custody. I call her out boldly for her complete horrendous behavior & jealousy to stoop so low to hurt my baby and commit felony perjury in a court of law to corroborate and collude in legal abuse, kidnapping in the first degree, and concealment and abuse of a minor, intent to inflict pain and suffering, malicious intent, and defamation. I posted my rough drafts below the photo.
a rule that declares NOT admissible as evidence any statement other than that by a witness while testifying at a hearing and offered into evidence to prove the truth of the matter stated.
Uniform Rule of Evidence 63.
The reason for the hearsay rule is that THE CREDIBILITY OF THE WITNESS is the KEY INGREDIENT in the weighting of Truth of his statement; so when that statement is made out of court, without the benefit of cross-examination and without the witness’s demeanor being subject to assessment by the trier of fact (judge or jury), there is generally no adequate basis for determining whether the out of court statement is true. 6 Wigmore, Evidence §1766 (Chadbourne rev. 1981 and 4th ed. 1988).
BARRON’S LEGAL GUIDES – LAW DICTIONARY pgs. 228-229.
The SO much money she is speaking of, is ONE TIME of $300 she sent FROM STUDENT LOANS FROM THE US GOVERNMENT…and she sent it without me asking or even inferring I needed any money, or needed her for anything. It was at Christmas and she said it was a Christmas present. Do you see how she has skewed everything to defame me to get my son taken!?
Do you know she made her husband sign the rights away to his first son because she was jealous of John Barbee’s first child?!
She got my high school sweetheart addicted to shooting heroin and he eventually died because of her succubus influence.
Jennifer Barbee has a history of home-wrecking and child abusing, and that will be known far and wide to protect other mothers and children from her reckless, felonious, and criminal malicious intent to hurt wholesome families that don’t live their lives and pay their bills through criminal actions and exploiting their bodies like she does, day in and day out.
Sociopathy and pathological lying, and malicious intent to hurt a mother and child because of your own jealousy of them, is a mental illness Jennifer Barbee…especially when you are compulsively, and on heavy drugs, trying to hurt my baby to appease your jealousy of me.
Its so sad. I am suing Jennifer Barbee in federal court! She’s been evading the IRS for over 10 years, stripping for over 10 years every night, doing heroin and oxycontin every day for over 10 years, and living a double life, trying to hide your low-life white trash innate tendencies, and her desire to hurt children.
Jennifer Barbee has been obsessed with me for that whole 10 year period (look at her above texts, weeks before she wrote her false perjured testimony. She has literally had sex with every ex – boyfriend I had in adolescence, and had sex with every man in our group of friends, 20+ men. She was passed around like an old gross tee-shirt among all the men I knew growing up, and she enjoyed the attention and being a literal whore, immensely.
Jennifer Barbee is being exposed in 2017, more than she could ever imagine, and I will prosecute her until she is in debt and in prison for what she has done to me and my son!
Does THAT PUBLIC POST LOOK like LOVE?! “so many people tried to help her”….pathological lying and defamation on Lonna to get River taken?!!
SO many drug addict strippers are lying on me in court to “help me”?!!….Jennifer Barbee is absolute pathological psychotic sociopath!
Jennifer Barbee is a sociopath, hardcore drug addict for over 10+ years, a career stripper for the same amount of time,a pathological liar, and child abuser!
Lonna trying to help Jennifer Barbee get off heroin and oxycontin with herbs in the texts below. Spring 2015. Jenny was on drugs when she wrote the testimony lying about Lonna a couple months later in July 2015. Evidence Below:
Why are these old men concealing my baby for 17+ months from his own mother?!
What do a bunch of old men need a baby for?
This is Obvious & Overt Child Abuse!
Why are they hiding my baby?!!
So we don’t see all the abuse he is enduring on a daily basis?!
5,200 Pentagon Employees Bought Child Pornography, Investigation halted after 8 Months
Endangering the Welfare of a Child,
RCW 9A.08.010(1)( d):
“CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE. A person is criminally negligent or acts with criminal negligence when he or she fails to be aware of a substantial risk that a wrongful act may occur and his or her failure to be aware of such substantial risk constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in the same situation.”
Chapter 9A.40. Kidnapping, Unlawful Imprisonment, and Custodial Interference
9A.40.020. Kidnapping in the first degree
(1) A person is guilty of kidnapping in the first degree if he or she intentionally abducts another person with intent:
(a) To hold him or her for ransom or reward, or as a shield or hostage; or
(b) To facilitate commission of any felony or flight thereafter; or
(c) To inflict bodily injury on him or her; or
(d) To inflict extreme mental distress on him, her, or a third person;
(e) To interfere with the performance of any governmental function.
******(2) Kidnapping in the first degree is a class A felony.******
[2011 c 336 § 364, eff. July 22, 2011; 1975 1st ex.s. c 260 § 9A.40.020.]
Restrictions Adam and Nathan Cliber And WA State Broke According To WA State Law:
26.09.191. Restrictions in temporary or permanent parenting plans
(1) The permanent parenting plan shall not require mutual decision-making or designation of a dispute resolution process other than court action if it is found that a parent has engaged in any of the following conduct: (a) Willful abandonment that continues for an extended period of time or substantial refusal to perform parenting functions; (b) physical, sexual, or a pattern of emotional abuse of a child; or (c) a history of acts of domestic violence as defined in RCW 26.50.010(1) or an assault or sexual assault which causes grievous bodily harm or the fear of such harm.
(2)(a) The parent’s residential time with the child shall be limited if it is found that the parent has engaged in any of the following conduct: (i) Willful abandonment that continues for an extended period of time or substantial refusal to perform parenting functions; (ii) physical, sexual, or a pattern of emotional abuse of a child; (iii) a history of acts of domestic violence as defined in RCW 26.50.010(1) or an assault or sexual assault which causes grievous bodily harm or the fear of such harm; or (iv) the parent has been convicted as an adult of a sex offense under:
(b) The parent’s residential time with the child shall be limited if it is found that the parent resides with a person who has engaged in any of the following conduct: (i) Physical, sexual, or a pattern of emotional abuse of a child; (ii) a history of acts of domestic violence as defined in RCW 26.50.010(1) or an assault or sexual assault that causes grievous bodily harm or the fear of such harm; or (iii) the person has been convicted as an adult or as a juvenile has been adjudicated of a sex offense under:
(3) A parent’s involvement or conduct may have an adverse effect on the child’s best interests, and the court may preclude or limit any provisions of the parenting plan, if any of the following factors exist:
(a) A parent’s neglect or substantial nonperformance of parenting functions;
(b) A long-term emotional or physical impairment which interferes with the parent’s performance of parenting functions as defined in RCW 26.09.004;
(c) A long-term impairment resulting from drug, alcohol, or other substance abuse that interferes with the performance of parenting functions;
(d) The absence or substantial impairment of emotional ties between the parent and the child;
(e) The abusive use of conflict by the parent which creates the danger of serious damage to the child’s psychological development;
(f) A parent has withheld from the other parent access to the child for a protracted period without good cause; or
(g) Such other factors or conduct as the court expressly finds adverse to the best interests of the child.
(4) In cases involving allegations of limiting factors under subsection (2)(a)(ii) and (iii) of this section, both parties shall be screened to determine the appropriateness of a comprehensive assessment regarding the impact of the limiting factor on the child and the parties.
It is against WA State Law for River to be with Adam Right now and since Sept 16, 2015
(6) In determining whether any of the conduct described in this section has occurred, the court shall apply the civil rules of evidence, proof, and procedure.
(7) For the purposes of this section:
(b) “Social worker” means a person with a master’s or further advanced degree from a social work educational program accredited and approved as provided in RCW 18.320.010.
It is against WA State Law for River to be with Adam Right now and since Sept 16, 2015 :
(6) In determining whether any of the conduct described in this section has occurred, the court shall apply the civil rules of evidence, proof, and procedure.
——>>>>>> https://www.gofundme.com/LonnaAndRiverFam <<<<<<<——–