#AMothersRevolution ~ Legal Means And Ways to #BringRiverHome And to Bring YOUR Children HOME △🌹▽

Seattle 8:26:16
Local Seattle Photographer Tim Durkan ~ August 26, 2016

The Department of Justice and each United States Attorney’s Office are committed to protecting our children. Our goal “is to prevent child sexual exploitation from occurring in the first place, in order to protect every child’s opportunity and right to have a childhood that is free from sexual abuse, trauma, and exploitation so that they can become the adults they were meant to be.                                                                                                                                        [We seek to] accomplish that goal by efficiently leveraging assets across the federal government in a coordinated manner.”

– The National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction.

DOJ Statement.jpeg



Legal Abuse Syndrome.jpeg

Contact the OIG Hotline Concerning DOJ Employees or Programs

If you would like to submit supporting documentation, please mail in your complaint with the supporting documentation to the address listed below, instead of using our online form.

Submit Report Online

Phone: (800) 869-4499

Fax: (202) 616-9881

Mailing Address:

U.S. Department of Justice
Office of the Inspector General
Investigations Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Room 4706
Washington, DC 20530


Save River Vote Them Out:Expose Them Flyer 8:18:16.jpeg

Contact the OIG Hotline Concerning Violation of Civil Rights or Civil Liberties by a DOJ Employee

If you would like to submit supporting documentation, please mail in your complaint with the supporting documentation to the address listed below, instead of using our online form.

Section 1001 of the USA Patriot Act directs the Inspector General to review information and receive complaints alleging abuses of civil rights and civil liberties by Department of Justice employees. The OIG has created a special section in its Investigations Division to process these complaints. This section will identify the more serious civil rights and civil liberties allegations and assign them to OIG employees for investigation. The OIG will refer other complaints to Department components for their review and handling.

Submit Report Online

Phone: (800) 869-4499

Fax: (202) 616-9898

Mailing Address:

U.S. Department of Justice
Office of the Inspector General
Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Complaints
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Room 4706
Washington, D.C. 20530



U.S. Attorneys » Justice 101
Introduction To The Federal Court System

“The federal court system has three main levels: district courts (the trial court), circuit courts which are the first level of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States, the final level of appeal in the federal system. There are 94 district courts, 13 circuit courts, and one Supreme Court throughout the country.”


The Bill of Rights.jpeg


Washington State Form: http://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/sites/wawd/files/1983CivilRightsComplaintRev4-8-2013.pdf

What is Section 1983?

“Section 1983” refers to 42 U.S.C. §1983, the federal statute that enables you to file a civil action for deprivation of constitutional and federal statutory rights by persons acting under “color of law.” Originally enacted in 1871, Section 1983 litigation experienced a period of dormancy, until 1961 and the landmark Supreme Court case, Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961), which gave private litigants a federal court remedy as a first resort rather than only in default of (or after) state action. Today, Section 1983 actions most commonly involve 1st Amendment issues like freedom of speech; 4th Amendment issues like search and seizure or use of force; 8th Amendment issues like cruel and unusual punishment; and 14th Amendment claims of due process violations.


Kidnapping of River 9:16:15 collage copy


“Known as “The Great Writ,” habeas corpus gives citizens the power to get help form courts to keep government and prisons and similar institutions in check.”

Who may file writ of habeas corpus. Any person “restrained of his liberty under any pretense whatever, may prosecute a writ of habeas corpus.” RCW 7.36.010. Parents, guardians, spouses, and next of kin may file on behalf of the restrained individual. RCW 7.36.020.

Habeas corpus (/ˈheɪbiəs ˈkɔːrpəs/; Medieval Latin meaning literally “You may have the body”[1]) is a recourse in law whereby a person can report an unlawful detention or imprisonment before a court, usually through a prison official.[2]

A writ of habeas corpus is known as “the great and efficacious writ in all manner of illegal confinement”,[Note 1] being a remedy available to the meanest against the mightiest. It is a summons with the force of a court order; it is addressed to the custodian (a prison official for example) and demands that a prisoner be taken before the court, and that the custodian present proof of authority, allowing the court to determine whether the custodian has lawful authority to detain the prisoner. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus




“Due process is the legal requirement that the state must respect all legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due process violation, which offends the rule of law.”


Pro Se Federal Cases .jpeg


is an error declared by an appellate court to be patently obvious in a lower court decision or action and causes a reversal. When a defendant raises an issue on appeal that was not raised before the judge, the court of appeals may review for plain error. Federal procedural rules define plain error as a highly prejudicial error affecting substantial rights.

The appellant has the burden to show plain error, which is error that is clear or obvious and that materially prejudices the substantial rights of appellant; once appellant has met his burden of persuasion, the burden shifts to the government to show that the error was not prejudicial. To be plain error: (1) there must be an error; (2) the error must be plain (clear or obvious); and (3) the error must materially prejudice the substantial rights of the defendant).

A Writ of Coram Nobis / In Forma Pauperis



Kathryn Murray, MSW 6.2.16 copyKathryn Murray, MSW 6.2.16 attach. pg 2





River's Baby Sitter Vaneh Letter 8:2015.jpeg




Larry Lewis to Lonna 1_14.jpeg


Court Case number #15-5002288-SEA
King County, Seattle, WA.

Key players to be investigated:

-Lawrence Lewis (Adam’s Father, Funnels Money)
-Adam Lewis (River’s Father, Abuser, Kidnapper, Concealing River since 9/16/15.)
-NATHAN CLIBER – Adam’s Seattle Attorney, (Seattle Divorce Services)
-Jamie Johnston (King County, WA Prosecutor)

-Jennifer Barbee
-Jamie Pennell
-Carol Hough

Lonna Marie Anderson coming soon to Washington State:

CORRUPT JUDGES (w/phone and room numbers):

– Henry Judson [Seattle – Ex Parte / Probate (206) 477-2517] -James Doerty (RETIRED)
-Susan Amini [KENT Maleng Rm-E-960 – (206) 477-2548]
-Barbara Linde [KENT Maleng-Rm-3C-(206) 477-1361]
-Kathryn Fields (Retired)
-Bonnie Canada-Thurston [Seattle-Family Law- (206) 477-1512]
-Carlos Velategui [Seattle – Ex Parte / Probate (206) 477-2517]
-Susan Svetsky (Oregon Judge) [ Rm-318- (503).988.3060]
-Larry Besk (RETIRED)
-Richard Eadie (Trial Judge-Refused Most of Lonna’s Evidence and All her witnesses) Seattle- Rm -W-728 -(206) 477-1525]
-Susan Craighead (Lied about Lonna to The Women’s Coalition–gave false information to cover for felonies of her peers and subordinates–Rm E-942 – (206) 477-1435]

Lawrence LewisUgh Wizard of OZ

“I am writing the Washington State Judicial Commission to address a severe injustice perpetrated against me and my son starting in June of 2015, and beginning earlier that year in January 2015. I am requesting relief from this burdensome criminal injustice committed against me and my son, and also an investigation into the matters I am about to explain.

I am a single mother of a young toddler boy who is currently 31 months old, but whom I have not been able to see or hold since September 16, 2015, since he was 20 months old. My child was forcefully removed from my physical and legal custody by purposefully rushed and falsified legal proceedings that should have never been allowed to occur by standards of Washington’s State Family Law RCW Code, the Federal Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA), Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (PKPA), and Washington State’s Judicial Commission Code of Conduct and Canons. I am concurrently also requesting a Federal Audit into all proceedings that have occurred dating back to my son’s birth, January 14, 2014, and all future proceedings that will occur with this case and subsequent counter lawsuits pertaining…..” -Lonna

[First part of the Judicial Conduct Complaint On Those Involved With River’s Kidnapping and the abuse of River and Lonna]

[The Supreme Court has warned, “Because of what appear to be Lawful commands [Statutory Rules, Regulations and -codes–ordinances- and Restrictions] on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance… [deceptive practices, constructive fraud, barratry, legal plunder, conversion, and malicious prosecution in inferior administrative State courts].” (United States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187, 76 S.Ct. 281, 100 L.Ed. 185 (1956);]







Related Links:









Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s