February 2, 2016 ~ (Post Conference – Pre Trial) My Emails:

 

Lonna Anderson <thyme2heal726@gmail.com> Jan 30, 2016

to: Lonna Anderson <Thyme2heal726@gmail.com>,
adam lewis <leavnroots@yahoo.com>,
Nathan <nathan@seattledivorceservices.com>,
“Johnston, Jamie” <Jamie.Johnston@kingcounty.gov>,
“Auditor, IPR Mail” <ipr@portlandoregon.gov>

date: Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 3:17 AM                                                                                            subject: River 1/30/16
NATHAN–JAMIE—AND ADAM.

I KNOW YOU DONT JUST EXPECT ME TO BE OKAY WITH ARBITRARILY KEEPING MY SON FROM ME AGAINST THE LAW…..

SO JAMIE JOHNSTON
—AS A STATE OFFICIAL KNOWING THERE IS ILLEGAL ACTIVITY WHICH IS WITHHOLDING MY SON FROM ME—AND ABUSIVE USE OF CONFLICT KEEPING ME FROM BEING ABLE SEE RIVER IN 4.5 MONTHS

I IMPLORE YOU TO INTERCEDE WITH NATHAN AND FIND A WAY FOR ME TO SEE MY SON NOW–

-OR I GO ABOVE YOUR HEAD TO DAN SATTERBERG.

BECAUSE YOU ARE A STATE OFFICIAL WATCHING AND ALLOWING THIS–

KNOWING THIS IS ALL AGAINST THE LAW FROM THE VERY BEGINNING–AND WITH THE EVIDENCE I SUBMITTED IN AUGUST.

I WANT TO SEE MY SON BEGINNING OF NEXT WEEK.

LETS ARRANGE THIS…..SO WE CAN ALL STAY WITHIN THE LAW.

OTHERWISE, I WANT TO ARRANGE THIS WITH YOUR BOSS AND WASHINGTON CPS, AND STATE BAR ASSOCIATION.

..YOU WILL NEED TO BE INVESTIGATED FOR CHILD ABUSE, IF YOU REFUSE.

LET ME KNOW ASAP.

LONNA ANDERSON

PORTLAND POLICE COMMUNITY REVIEW WHO IS ON THEIR 2ND INVESTIGATION WITH THIS CASE—IS CC’D.

———————————————————————-

from: Lonna Anderson <thyme2heal726@gmail.com>

to: Lonna Anderson <Thyme2heal726@gmail.com>,
adam lewis <leavnroots@yahoo.com>,
Nathan <nathan@seattledivorceservices.com>,
“Johnston, Jamie” <Jamie.Johnston@kingcounty.gov>,
“Auditor, IPR Mail” <ipr@portlandoregon.gov>

date: Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 3:32 AM
subject: Re: River 1/30/16

You might think I am too forward with all this, but I really don’t care. I will remind you THIS IS MY CHILD YOU HAVE MESSED WITH.

MY CHILD.

I DIDNT HOLD ALL YOUR LOVED ONES AWAY FROM YOUR OVER THE HOLIDAYS TO ABUSE YOU….
Not this year, anyway.

BUT YOU DID THAT TO ME AND RIVER.

So I don’t expect you to be pleased about this—YOU ARE DOING IT IN THE FIRST PLACE—WHICH SHOWS WHO AND WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT….CALLOUS CHILD ABUSERS THAT SHOULD NOT BE WORKING WITH THE PUBLIC OR CHILDREN—IN THE SLIGHTEST.

A goal of mine

 

———————————————————————-

from: Lonna Anderson <thyme2heal726@gmail.com>
to: Lonna Anderson <Thyme2heal726@gmail.com>,
adam lewis <leavnroots@yahoo.com>,
Nathan <nathan@seattledivorceservices.com>,
“Johnston, Jamie” <Jamie.Johnston@kingcounty.gov>,
“Auditor, IPR Mail” <ipr@portlandoregon.gov>

date: Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 4:37 AM
subject: Re: River 1/30/16
JAMIE JOHNSTON AND OTHERS— I KNOW YOU ARE READING THESE.

YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR KNOWING THIS INFORMATION….AND DOING NOTHING.

OR WORSE—KEEPING RIVER AWAY BECAUSE YOU KNOW THE TRAUMATIC EFFECT ON HIM..

AND YOU DONT THINK YOU ARENT GONNA BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS?!?

YOU ARE MISTAKEN.

————————————–

October 5, 2015

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing this letter as a mental health professional and former faculty advisor to Lonna Anderson. This is the second letter I have written on Lonna’s behalf and on the behalf of her son, River Anderson. My first letter documented my experience working with Lonna as her professor, supporting her studies in the field of developmental neurobiology and attachment psychology. This letter expresses my concern for her and her son given what I understand to be the familiar dynamics of domestic psychological abuse and the use of custody and the legal system to enact abuse on women and children.

While I am not in a position to speak to the facts of Lonna’s claim to domestic violence, I am in a position to provide insight into Lonna’s character, the dynamics of abusive behavior, and the impact of both on the health and well-being of a child.

The best interests of the child are, of course, at the heart of this case. Our central shared concern is not whether Adam abused Lonna, but rather whether there is sufficient reason to cause significant and abiding trauma to River by removing him from his mother’s care. An understanding of abuse dynamics can, however, illuminate potential reasons for choosing the path of traumatizing the child that has thus far taken place. If Adam did abuse Lonna, and if (as most abusers) he lied to protect himself, it is squarely within the dynamics of abuse that he would use custody, and River, to exert further control over the situation. We are all in a position to share our limited perspectives, none of which tell the whole story. However, this is not something that I feel the court should overlook, as it is a clear pattern that shapes many similar cases.

In the years that I have known Lonna, I have experienced her to be a sensitive, caring human being. She has radical and unorthodox political ideas and she is outspoken (sometimes overly so) about her beliefs and her values. (These facts are, of course, irrelevant to any assessment of her parenting.) I have had several conversations with her in the last several weeks and, based on those conversations, I have no reason to believe she is irrational or untethered to reality. She demonstrates the ability to receive both support and constructive criticism, to think critically about her own positions, step into multiple perspectives while remaining focused on the welfare of her child. Lonna is clearly experiencing trauma. The strong emotions that she feels and expresses are, from several perspectives, healthy and appropriate responses to the situation she finds herself in. As a student of psychology, Lonna understands the intersubjective field in which her experience, her feelings and her expressions of feeling exist.

I do not believe that Lonna has “severe untreated mental health challenges” that are impacting her parenting. I believe she is experiencing trauma. It is highly possible that this allegation serves to protect Adam more than to protect River.

I believe Lonna desperately needs a lawyer to help her understand how to navigate this legal situation and supportive therapy to help her navigate the same. I understand that she is mistrustful of a psychological evaluation from a chosen list of professionals. Given her experience thus far, this level of mistrust need not be pathologized.

In the decades that I have been a mental health professional, I have come to understand the nuances of interpersonal trauma, and the effect of interpersonal trauma on a child’s development. It is for this reason that I echo the words of Lonna’s social worker, Kathryn Murray, who describes Lonna as River’s best caregiver.

Classically, there are a few possible responses to abuse. One is fear, which involves placating the abuser, and another is anger, which hopefully involves setting boundaries with the abuser. Typically many responses are happening simultaneously. They are all ‘normal’ from an adaptive perspective. However, research shows that setting boundaries with an abuser will necessarily provoke more abuse.

Increased abuse can take many forms: manipulation, gaslighting, blaming, redefining abuse and lying. Abusive partners redefine situations to blame the other for their behaviors or to prevent consequences of those behaviors. They seldom admit that they are wrong and will blame someone else when they act inappropriately. In addition, most abusers also lie about it. They lie to manipulate their victims, to control the situation, and to keep the victim off balance psychologically. We all need to keep these things in mind, not to pin them inappropriately on anyone, but to hold open the possibility that these realities exist in the lives of children. Abusers often appear calm in the face of other people’s trauma. Their blood pressure goes down as the abuse goes up. While it might look good from an outside perspective, we should not abandon healthy skepticism.

Thank you for considering my thoughts,

Sarah Van Hoy, PhD, L.Ac., LMHC

Addendum to letter of 10/5/15 for the courts on behalf of Lonna Anderson
I remain deeply concerned about the well-being of River Anderson. The disruption of the emotional bond with his mother is a profoundly traumatic experience for any child, one that carries long term developmental consequences. Such a bond should not be disrupted without documented evidence that her care puts him at risk. There is no evidence to this effect. Therefore, his removal from her care seems to be well outside the court’s indented purpose of acting in the best interest of the child. I urge the court to de-escalate the situation, put the child’s best interest first, and design a parenting plan that involves time with both parents – returning the child to the primary care of his primary attachment figure, his mother and making arrangements for safe contact and exchange between the two parents.

Sarah Van Hoy, PhD, L.Ac., LMHC

———————————

October 30, 2015

Dear Senator Murray,

I would like to call your attention to a concerning matter taking place in the State of Washington. As a former resident of Seattle (and supporter of yours) I find myself wondering if there is anything we, as concerned citizens, and you, as a Senator, can do to right this situation.

Lonna Anderson, a former student of mine at Goddard College, recently had a child. While she was pregnant, her then partner and the father of the child became, according to Lonna’s consistent accounts, physically and emotionally abusive to her. He wanted her to abort the pregnancy and she instead decided to leave Washington State and become a mother.

Throughout her pregnancy and after she gave birth, Lonna was completely in love with her child. Before and after her son was born, she sought to do the very best for him on every level: physical, emotional and spiritual. She fed him the best foods, she parented him with positivity and love, she supported his cognitive and emotional development, she attended to his needs to create a childhood of joy and opportunity.
She also thought it would be good for her son, River, to have his father in his life.

Unfortunately, the relationship with the father devolved into a situation that again felt unsafe. She sought a protection order. He responded by “lawyering up” and seeking custody of the child. The first judge threw out the father’s case and told Lonna to seek counsel. Another hearing later, however, a new judge decided to grant temporary custody to the father.

There is enough evidence to strongly suggest that this child is being used as a tool for exerting control over Lonna, i.e. as a tool of domestic abuse.

While I cannot confirm or deny (nor can anyone except the parties involved) the facts of the relationship between Lonna and Adam, I can say what is obvious and takes no courage to acknowledge: any parent or person who completely withholds a child from his primary caregiver for any reason other than the actual safety of the child is not acting in the best interest of the child, but in their own self-interest.

Moreover, such behavior and choices speak hauntingly of an empathy disorder. Lonna has become traumatized by this ongoing experience and the father appears to be using her visibly traumatized behavior as a reason to continue to withhold the child.

I am concerned because the courts, rather than acting in the best interest of the child, appear to be, in this moment, aiding and abetting a situation that they should responsibly be de-escalating. This is the purpose of family court and of responsible and compassionate legal counsel.

The use of the legal system to enact domestic violence is well-documented but not yet well understood. I understand legal or legislative action has been taken in California where other concerned citizens have spoken out as I am doing here. I am sure you agree that this is a serious issue for all women and children.

I urge your office to look into this and to seek any means of correction possible.

Thank you for your time,
Sarah Van Hoy, PhD, L.Ac., LMHC.

———————————————————————-

from: Lonna Anderson <thyme2heal726@gmail.com>
to: Lonna Anderson <Thyme2heal726@gmail.com>,
adam lewis <leavnroots@yahoo.com>,
Nathan <nathan@seattledivorceservices.com>,
“Johnston, Jamie” <Jamie.Johnston@kingcounty.gov>,
“Auditor, IPR Mail” <ipr@portlandoregon.gov>

date: Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 4:55 AM
subject: Re: River 1/30/16

YOU RUINED OUR LIVES TO HELP OUR DOMESTIC ABUSER FOR MONEY

AND YOU STILL — TO THIS DAY — KEEP GOING WITH YOUR ILLEGAL CONCEALING OF MY CHILD OVER STATE LINES,

OUTRIGHT FELONIES FOR ALL OF YOU….AND YOU KNOW IT.

AND YOU THINK YOU ARE NOT GOING TO EXPERIENCE MAJOR CONSEQUENCES FOR THAT??!!!

YOU ARE MISTAKEN.

RCW 26.09.191 7B—ALL ATTACHMENTS WERE GIVEN TO THE COURTS IN AUGUST 2015…

ALL OF WHAT YOU HAVE DONE IS UNLAWFUL—AND YOU KNEW IT WHILE YOU WERE DOING IT

YOU WERE AND ARE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ME AND MY SON….THE LAW, AND BENDING IT TO YOUR DIRTY CHILD ABUSING AGENDA..

COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE.

COMPLETELY UNLAWFUL.

YOU WILL BE PROSECUTED FOR THESE ACTS.

BRING MY SON HOME. NOW.

12113398_10100131416657269_345186443044588287_o
River Happy With His Momma! Before They took him~ Sept 2015
River is depressed 10.29.15 -withheld from his mother
The last time before his birthday I got to speak with my son 10/29/15–because of Adam’s concealment of River to abuse us both. the only other time since then has been 1/14/16 his birthday–ADAM IS CONCEALING MY SON! AND THE STATE KNOWS! THIS IS CHILD ABUSE!

RCW 26.09.191 Statutes Broken By Adam pg1RCW 26.09.191 Statutes Broken By Adam pg2

 

Maryland Social Worker with notesNancy MSW For Lonna October 2014Social Worker Evidence-3 years with notesSocial Worker pg 2 with NotesDr.Olson For Courts 8.19.15 w:notes p1Dr.Olson For Courts 8.19.15 w:notes p2

9.28.15 Social Worker Kathryn w:notes

Scan 4Lonna's Medical MJ Card and WA ST ID

 

Photo on 1-23-16 at 6.26 PM #2

 

THE VERY LAST TIME I SAW MY SON–SEPT 16, 2015. THERE WAS NO LEGAL REASON TO DO THIS IN THE FIRST PLACE, AND THERE IS NO LEGAL REASON THEY ARE ALLOWED TO KEEP MY SON FROM ME IN CONCEALMENT, ACROSS STATE LINES, FOR ALMOST 5 MONTHS NOW. THIS IS PURE DOMESTIC AND CHILD ABUSE USING MAJOR SEXISM IN THE COURTS THROUGH MANIPULATION AND GASLIGHTING.

 

 

———————————————————————-

Lonna Anderson <thyme2heal726@gmail.com>
February 2, 2016 – 2:09 PM 

to Mary, Kathryn, Lisa, Nancy, james.kahan, linde.court, amini.court, Eadie, Hannah, Camille, Familylawstaff., Nathan, Jamie, Adam, bcc: hrosoff, bcc: KOMO, bcc: newstips
Nathan & Adam-

The 24th will be fine for mediation.

I don’t expect my requests and requirements to change regarding my Son River:

-full legal and physical custody
-Adam has River on the weekends (sat and sun)
-No Questionable people around my child (all of Adam’s witnesses–make good examples–considering their lifestyles-strippers/drug addicts/pedophiles/other neglectful and abusive mothers/women)
-$500 a month in Child Support.

Everything we were doing prior to Adam contacting you in June 2015, and what he told me we were doing up until papers got served to me on August 11, 2015—when the blackmail was confirmed through your legal documents.

My requests and requirements HAVE NOT CHANGED AT ALL –and even since before your blackmail began in July 2015, when Adam and I had our original arrangement.
After I contacted him to finally meet River in Dec 2014 when he was almost a year old, and all through 2015 and up until the blackmailing and sociopathic narrative flop of your client, Adam, in June/July 2015, this was ALWAYS OUR AGREED UPON ARRANGEMENT.

It only changed that July/August 2015 when you blackmailed me in front of the courts, and continue to try against all reason, logic, evidence, common sense, and the best interests of my child, River Anderson.

Its not working Nathan & Adam, and you are not fooling anyone but yourselves. This is becoming clearer and clearer to everyone around us as well. The Truth is always much better than convoluted false narratives meant to confuse, delude, and gaslight those with less access or understanding of the evidence and factual information backing up the reality of what really happened, factoring in the VERY IMPORTANT — TIMELINE OF EVENTS…which really shows motive for kidnapping and false nefarious agendas on both your behalf, Nathan and Adam.

(AN EXAMPLE—I HAVE NO HISTORY OF MENTAL ILLNESS OR ABUSIVE TENDENCIES–DOCUMENTED BY OFFICIALS OR OTHERWISE—ONLY YOUR CLIENTS FALSE TESTIMONY AND THE TESTIMONY OF HIS FRIENDS WHO HAVE NO PROBLEM LYING IN A COURT OF LAW—AGAINST EVIDENCE—YOUR CLIENT HAS A WELL DOCUMENTED HISTORY OF DOMESTIC ABUSE AND ERRATIC BEHAVIOR SHOWING MENTAL INSTABILITY—DOCUMENTED BY A MEDICAL DOCTOR.)

You’ll remember, and as evidence shows through our first email exchange between you and I, and also Jamie and I, that I made it VERY CLEAR my expectations with all of this.

River’s safety being #1.

This is before the socio-maniacal blackmail, where you tried to change the Truth to fit your client’s selfish and immature desires, at the detriment of my little baby and myself..and still to this day, you conceal him–NOT EVEN ALLOWING US TO TALK ON THE PHONE—presumably because you are sacred I am going to get more information regarding your abuse against my son—but WITHHOLDING HIM FROM HIS MOTHER AND EVEN COMMUNICATING WITH HER IS OVERT CHILD-ABUSE ENOUGH.

I feel this is probably all based around Adam’s control issues and abusive nature, combined with evading child support and his adult responsibilities entirely (hence not having a job in over a year, living off his parents, and his children and babies mommas while he does nothing for years).
This would explain getting a false restraining order on me 4 days after I applied to have the case moved to portland for fair due process and filed the 3rd restraining order on Adam in 3 months 10/21/15 for concealing and abusing River physically and with traumatic concealment for an infant-toddler who has only ever been with his mother, which is almost 5 months now.

5 months straight of child abuse on River from Nathan and Adam, by state law and clinical definition.
That’s all we know of so far factually.

Adam gets sick enjoyment from his mental/emotional/psychological and physical abuse, he has been in a pattern of perpetrating against me and my son for 3 years now, and this has been me and my doctor’s biggest concern. River’s doctor too. We are all worried about the signs of developmental regression we have already seen with River, just the little bit I have been allowed.

All of which has been seen by them first hand, and now with this court proceeding of kidnapping my child on lies and defamation of my character, built around a false persona you constructed for your agendas—your sociopathic behavior is MORE THAN EVIDENT AND OVERT.

I am a pretty consistent person.
My requests and requirements remain the same. I am well prepared to face you in court–and I am well prepared, to also make arrangements prior based of my basic parenting plan requirements, which are more than fair (especially considering the criminal behavior perpetrated against my and my son by Adam and whats happened over the last 6 months).

Advertisements

One thought on “February 2, 2016 ~ (Post Conference – Pre Trial) My Emails:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s